1 Comment

"While the vaccines remain highly effective at reducing severe illness," are they really?!

This type of statement seems just as absurd as saying "While face masks remain highly effective at reducing the rate of transmission"!

The cattle farm where I exist is one of the "countries" you refer in the article.

Today, Feb 10th, we have 91,22% of the cattle inoculated with 2 doses, and 55,09% with 3 doses.

Now to the FUN part...

If we consider in this scenario that death occurs on the severely ill (no reason to consider that death occurs on a mild case or even on the asymptomatic) the real life evidence (this naturally excludes the pharma studies made in-house) shows that these inoculations aren't "highly effective at reducing severe illness"

Official data for the cattle farm Portugal:

From 17Mar2020 to 26Dec2020 (285 days) WITHOUT "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 23

From 27Dec2020 to 07Oct2021 (also 285 days) WITH "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 40

So for the same period of time we can see that the introduction of the "vaccine" caused more deaths, which means caused more severe illness.

And if we continue to follow the count not even more days can do the trick!

From 27Dec2020 to 04Feb2022 (405 days!) WITH "vaccine": average daily deaths with PCR tag "COVID-19" - 34

So unless the "vaccine success" is being viewed from the "culling the cattle" perspective, it clearly does't look that the above statement is adequate.

Expand full comment